# Deep Doctoral Review Template

ไฟล์นี้เป็น template ตัวอย่างสำหรับผลตรวจเชิงลึก

ใน workspace จริง ให้ AI สร้างไฟล์ผลลัพธ์ชื่อ:

`04_review_notes/04_deep_review.md`

ใช้หลังจากมี:

- `04_review_notes/01_full_review.md`
- `04_review_notes/02_reference_audit.md`

## Deep Review Executive Summary

- Deep readiness:
- Strongest threat to the thesis argument:
- Most important evidence gap:
- Best next revision path:

## Evidence Boundary and Missing Inputs

| Boundary / missing input | Why it matters | Required source | Impact if unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

## Claim Map and Source Triangulation

| Core claim | Manuscript location | Manuscript evidence | Reference/result support | Established / debated / missing | Required verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |

## Recent Literature, Consensus, and Debate

- Current reference coverage:
- Missing recent work families:
- Competing perspectives:
- Mainstream position, if supported by workspace evidence:
- Debated or context-dependent points:
- Contradictory evidence that matters:

## Strongest Counter-Arguments

| Counter-argument | Evidence or logic behind it | What it attacks | Fix type | Required action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  | problem / method / baseline / metric / claim / ethics / scope | writing / evidence / experiment / reference / redesign |  |

## Claim Credibility Audit

| Claim | Status | Original source to verify | Date/version evidence | Misquote/context risk | Required fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | true / partially supported / unsupported / contradicted / missing input |  |  |  |  |

## Data and Result Interpretation

- Pattern 1:
- Pattern 2:
- Pattern 3:
- Anomaly or result that does not fit:
- Non-obvious conclusion supported by data:
- Reproducibility checks needed:
- Metric/denominator/sampling/ground-truth concerns:

## Decisive Tests and Failure Conditions

| Decisive test | What result would count as failure | Current evidence | Required next step |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

## Expert Breakdown for Student Revision

- Why the problem matters:
- Core concept sequence:
- Example from the manuscript:
- The main misunderstanding to fix:

## Decision Brief Under 500 Words

Write the decision brief here.

## Added Student Actions

| Priority | Action | Evidence needed | Expected output | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High |  |  |  |  |

## Deep Review State For Next Round

- Deep modules completed:
- Deep modules skipped:
- Missing evidence needed:
- Should not repeat unless new evidence appears:
- Next prompt to continue: